Electromagnetic Interference with Protocolized Electrosurgery Dispersive Electrode Positioning in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: Electromagnetic interference from monopolar electrosurgery may disrupt implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Current management recommendations by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and Heart Rhythm Society are based on expert clinical opinion since there is a paucity of data regarding the risk of electromagnetic interference to implantable cardioverter defibrillators during surgery. WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: With protocolized electrosurgery dispersive electrode positioning in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, the risk of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference was 7% in above-the-umbilicus noncardiac surgery and 0% in below-the-umbilicus surgery. In cardiac surgery, clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with use of an underbody dispersive electrode was 29%.Despite protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risk of electromagnetic interference in above-the-umbilicus surgery is high, supporting recommendations to suspend antitachycardia therapy when monopolar electrosurgery is used above the umbilicus.With protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risk of electromagnetic interference in below-the-umbilicus surgery is negligible, implying that suspending antitachycardia therapy might be unnecessary in these cases.With an underbody dispersive electrode, the risk of electromagnetic interference in cardiac surgery is high. BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the occurrence of intraoperative electromagnetic interference from monopolar electrosurgery in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing surgery. A protocolized approach was used to position the dispersive electrode. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study including 144 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators undergoing surgery between May 2012 and September 2016 at an academic medical center. The primary objectives were to determine the occurrences of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference (interference that would have resulted in delivery of inappropriate antitachycardia therapy had the antitachycardia therapy not been programmed off) in noncardiac surgeries above the umbilicus, noncardiac surgeries at or below the umbilicus, and cardiac surgeries with the use of an underbody dispersive electrode. RESULTS: The risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference were 14 of 70 (20%) and 5 of 70 (7%) in above-the-umbilicus surgery, 1 of 40 (2.5%) and 0 of 40 (0%) in below-the-umbilicus surgery, and 23 of 34 (68%) and 10 of 34 (29%) in cardiac surgery. Had conservative programming strategies intended to reduce the risk of inappropriate antitachycardia therapy been employed, the occurrence of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference would have been 2 of 70 (2.9%) in above-the-umbilicus surgery and 3 of 34 (8.8%) in cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with surgery above the umbilicus were high, supporting published recommendations to suspend antitachycardia therapy whenever monopolar electrosurgery is used above the umbilicus. For surgery below the umbilicus, these risks were negligible, implying that suspending antitachycardia therapy is likely unnecessary in these patients. For cardiac surgery, the risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with an underbody dispersive electrode were high. Conservative programming strategies would not have eliminated the risk of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference in either noncardiac surgery above the umbilicus or cardiac surgery.

Value of top-hat procedure in management of squamous intraepithelial lesion.

AIM: To investigate the features of skip lesions and evaluate value of top-hat procedure in management of squamous intraepithelial lesion. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in Peking University First Hospital between 2011 and 2016. Patients were confirmed to have CIN1-3. The term 'skip lesion' refers to lesion lying deep in cervical canal discontiguous with other lesions in transformation zone and was confirmed by top-hat. We compared their lesion grade in patients with or without skip lesion using logistic regression. We further reviewed patients who underwent subsequent hysterectomy within 6 months following LEEP and evaluated if top-hat procedure led to less residual lesions or was able to predict residual lesions. RESULTS: A total of 2260 patients were included and 595 underwent top-hat procedure. Thirty-nine out of 595 patients had skip lesions (6.5%), among whom two patients had CIN1 (5.1%), eight had CIN2 (20.5%) and 29 had CIN3 (74.4%). Logistical regression showed CIN3 was associated with higher risk of skip lesions compared to CIN1 (OR = 4.433, 95%CI: 1.036-18.964), while CIN2 was not (OR = 1.762, 95%CI: 0.366-8.471). Sixty-two patients underwent hysterectomy within 6 months following LEEP (CIN1-3), 24 underwent top-hat. Analysis revealed top-hat procedure did not result in less residual lesions. Colposcopy impression or prior HPV test was unable to predict skip lesions. CONCLUSION: About 9.4% patients with CIN3 had skip lesions in the study, which is associated with elevated risk for residual lesion. Top-hat procedure is able to detect skip lesions, but should not be performed on routinely because its prognostic value is not proved.

Variation in electrosurgical vessel seal quality along the length of a porcine carotid artery.

Electrosurgical vessel sealing has been demonstrated to have benefits for both patients and practitioners, but significant variation in the strength of the seal continues to be a concern. This study aims to examine the variation in electrosurgical seal quality along the length of a porcine common carotid artery and explore the relationships between seal quality, vessel size and morphology. Additionally, the study aimed to investigate the minimum safety threshold for successful seals and the influence of vessel characteristics on meeting this requirement. A total of 35 porcine carotid arteries were sealed using the PlasmaKinetic Open Seal device (Gyrus). Each seal was burst pressure tested and a sample taken for staining with elastin van Gieson's stain, with morphological quantification using image processing software ImageJ. With increasing distance from the bifurcation, there was an increase in seal strength and a reduction in both elastin content and vessel outer diameter. A significant correlation was found between burst pressure with both outer diameter (p < 0.0001) and elastin content (p = 0.001). When considering the safe limits of operation, vessels of less than 5 mm in outer diameter were shown to consistently produce a seal of a sufficient strength (burst pressure > 360 mmHg) irrespective of vessel morphology.

Surgeons have knowledge gaps in the safe use of energy devices: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of surgical energy devices and the potential for rare but serious complications, pilot data from North America suggest that surgeons and surgical trainees have knowledge gaps in their safe use. The purpose of this study was to determine baseline knowledge of general surgeons and surgical trainees regarding the safe use of electrosurgery (ES) across varying levels of experience in Japan. METHODS: Participants completed a 35-item multiple-choice question examination, testing critical knowledge of ES. The examination was developed according to the objectives and blueprints of SAGES' Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ curriculum. Sections of the examination included: "principles of ES," "ES-related adverse events," "monopolar and bipolar devices," and "pediatric considerations and interference with implantable devices." Scores were compared between PGY > 5 and PGY 1-5 participants. RESULTS: A total of 145 general surgeons and surgical trainees of all years after medical school (PGY 1-5: 57, PGY > 5: 88) from ten academic and five community hospitals completed the assessment (mean age 35; 91% male). The mean score in the entire cohort was 58 ± 12% (range 23-83%), with significantly higher scores in the PGY > 5 group compared to the PGY 1-5 group (60 ± 11 vs. 53 ± 12%, p < 0.01). Among all participants, 92% were not familiar with best practices when using ES on patients with a pacemaker; 44% believe that ES uses thermal energy from cautery; 19% did not know how to manage an operating room fire; 16% thought that a dispersive electrode should be cut to fit a child; and 27% believe that insulation failure in minimally invasive surgical instruments is mostly visible under careful inspection. CONCLUSIONS: General surgeons and trainees at all levels have knowledge gaps in the safe and effective use of energy devices, regardless of years of experience. There is a need for educational curricula to help address these gaps and contribute to safer surgery.

Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) treated with cold knife cone (CKC) biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of Western Australian patients with ACIS diagnosed between 2001 and 2012. Outcomes included pathological margin status and the incidence of persistent or recurrent endocervical neoplasia (ACIS and adenocarcinoma) during follow-up (<12 months) and surveillance (≥12 months) periods. RESULTS: The study group comprised 338 patients including 107 (32%) treated initially by LEEP and 231 (68%) treated by CKC biopsy. The mean age was 33.2 years (range 18 to 76 years) and median follow-up interval was 3.6 years (range <1 year to 11.8 years). Overall, 27 (8.0%) patients had ACIS persistence/recurrence while 9 (2.7%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma during the follow-up and surveillance periods. No patient died of cervical cancer within the study period. There were no significant differences in the incidence of persistent and/or recurrent endocervical neoplasia according to the type of excisional procedure. Patients with positive biopsy margins were 3.4 times more likely to have disease persistence or recurrence. CONCLUSION(S): LEEP and CKC biopsy appear equally effective in the treatment of ACIS for women wishing to preserve fertility. Patients undergoing conservative management for ACIS should be closely monitored, particularly if biopsy margins are positive in initial excision specimens. Patients and their clinicians should be aware of the potential risks of residual and recurrent disease.

Is screen-and-treat approach suited for screening and management of precancerous cervical lesions in Sub-Saharan Africa?

The World Health Organization guidelines for screening and management of cervical precancerous lesions updated in 2013 made an emphasis on the use of the 'screen-and-treat' approach for cervical cancer prevention. In order to facilitate scaling-up in low income settings, most of these screen-and-treat strategies do not involve confirmatory biopsy. This yields a certain rate of overtreatment. In other words, a majority of people undergoing screen-and-treat intervention who are treated does not necessarily benefit from the treatment. Therefore, the issue of potential short term and long term complications of the recommended treatment procedures (cryotherapy and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure) arises. This question has seldom been studied in resource poor countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa where Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection is rampant in an epidemic fashion and where the procreative capacities are socially rewarding for women. We draw the attention of the scientific community and policy makers to the fact that the lack of evidence supporting the safety of these treatment procedures in African populations may have an impact on the acceptability of these strategies and therefore on the effectiveness of screening programs.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: how much excision is enough?

This is a retrospective observational study to compare outcomes in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) using combined ectocervical/endocervical resection vs ectocervical resection alone. We demonstrated that additional endocervical resection during loop electrosurgical excision procedure did not significantly lower the risk of subsequent recurrence compared with ectocervical resection alone, in the treatment of CIN. With current published data supporting subsequent increased adverse effects of LEEP on future obstetrical outcomes, endocervical excision should be applied selectively. We recommend that additional endocervical excision should be reserved only for patients with a strong suspicion of underlying endocervical canal involvement based on colposcopic assessment or in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy, where it is essential to evaluate the endocervical canal.

Implementing AORN recommended practices for electrosurgery.

Technology is constantly changing, and it is important for perioperative nurses to stay current on new products and technologies in the perioperative setting. AORN's "Recommended practices for electrosurgery" addresses safety standards that all perioperative personnel should follow to minimize risks to both patients and staff members during the use of electrosurgical devices. Recommendations include how to select electrosurgical units and accessories for purchase, how to minimize the potential for patient and staff member injuries, what precautions to take during minimally invasive surgery, and how to avoid surgical smoke hazards. The recommendations also address education/competency, documentation, policies and procedures, and quality assurance/performance improvement. Perioperative nurses should consider the use of checklists and safety posters to remind staff members of the dangers of electrosurgery and the steps to take to minimize the risks for injury.

Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: compliance among perioperative nurses.

More than 500,000 health care workers are exposed to surgical smoke every year. Toxic gases create an offensive odor, small particulate matter causes respiratory complications, and pathogens may be transmitted in the surgical smoke to the surgical team. Previous research notes that perioperative nurses do not consistently follow smoke evacuation recommendations. The purpose of this study was to determine key indicators that are associated with compliance with smoke evacuation recommendations. Data from a web-based survey completed by 777 nurse members of AORN were analyzed to examine the relationship between the key indicators and compliance with smoke evacuation recommendations. Major findings were that specific key indicators influencing compliance include increased knowledge and training, positive perceptions about the complexity of the recommendations, and increased specialization, interconnectedness, and leadership support in larger facilities. Education programs can be developed that directly address these key predictors so that a surgical environment free from surgical smoke is promoted.

Compliance with surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: implications for practice.

Surgical smoke presents a serious health hazard, but perioperative nurses' compliance with smoke evacuation recommendations is not consistent. I investigated key indicators for compliance with electrosurgical smoke evacuation recommendations based on nurses' individual innovativeness characteristics, perceptions of the attributes of smoke evacuation recommendations, and organizational innovativeness characteristics. The study findings provide implications for improving nurses' compliance with smoke evacuation recommendations. Individual innovativeness characteristics, including nurses' knowledge and training, were most strongly linked to smoke evacuation compliance. The key indicators that promote surgical smoke evacuation can provide direction to guide the content of education programs and help identify the personnel and settings that are most in need of this information. Barriers to compliance included lack of equipment, physician resistance, noise, and staff member complacency. Vendor demonstrations on the ease of smoke evacuation device use can show nurses that smoke evacuation is compatible with nursing practice. Facility leaders should provide smoke evacuation policies that are easy to understand and should enforce these policies.

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: the use of electrosurgical units.

Electrosurgery is used in the majority of endoscopic therapeutic procedures. An understanding of the fundamental electrosurgical principles and various settings available on electrosurgical units is essential for the safe and effective use of electrosurgery during endoscopy. The aims of these technical guidelines are to: (1) expose physical principles relevant to the understanding of electrosurgery during endoscopy; (2) describe and provide practical recommendations regarding electrosurgical units that are commonly in use; (3) discuss the clinical relevance of technologies recently implemented in newer electrosurgical units; and (4) review factors relevant to commonly performed therapeutic procedures, including polypectomy, sphincterotomy, contact thermal hemostasis, and argon plasma coagulation.

Comparison between electrosurgery and cold blade in tongues of rats: a preliminary experimental study.

PURPOSE: To compare tissue cicatrization in the tongue of rats using electrosurgery and the cold blade. METHODS: Ten adult male Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 5 animals each, according to the time of sacrifice (3 and 7 days). Each animal had two incisions, one made with a cold blade and the other with an electric blade, both of which were approximately 0.5 mm in length. Following sacrifice of the animals, the tongues were submitted to a histological study in order to classify the presence of angiogenesis, fibroblastic proliferation, epithelial proliferation and inflammatory cells as good, moderate and weak. RESULTS: The wound made with electric blade presented a delay in the healing process and a greater inflammatory response as compared with the cold blade, despite the fact that there was no statistically significant difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There were no significant statistical differences between electrosurgery and the cold blade in relation to angiogenesis, fibroblastic proliferation, epithelial proliferation or the presence of inflammatory cells at any time of evaluation.

Comparison between eletrosurgery and cold blade in tongues of rats: a preliminary experimental study / Estudo comparativo entre eletrocirurgia e bisturi frio em língua de ratos: estudo preliminar experimental

PURPOSE: To compare tissue cicatrization in the tongue of rats using electrosurgery and the cold blade. METHODS: Ten adult male Wistar rats were divided into two groups of 5 animals each, according to the time of sacrifice (3 and 7 days). Each animal had two incisions, one made with a cold blade and the other with an electric blade, both of which were approximately 0.5 mm in length. Following sacrifice of the animals, the tongues were submitted to a histological study in order to classify the presence of angiogenesis, fibroblastic proliferation, epithelial proliferation and inflammatory cells as good, moderate and weak. RESULTS: The wound made with electric blade presented a delay in the healing process and a greater inflammatory response as compared with the cold blade, despite the fact that there was no statistically significant difference (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There were no significant statistical differences between electrosurgery and the cold blade in relation to angiogenesis, fibroblastic proliferation, epithelial proliferation or the presence of inflammatory cells at any time of evaluation.

OBJETIVO: Comparar a cicatrização tecidual com bisturi elétrico e frio em língua de ratos. MÉTODOS: A amostra foi de 10 ratos Wistar, divididos em dois grupos com 5 animais em cada, de acordo com o tempo de sacrifício (3 e 7 dias).Cada animal teve duas incisões transversais, com 0,5 mm de comprimento, no dorso da língua, sendo a mais anterior com a eletrocirurgia (experimento), e a mais posterior, com bisturi convencional (controle). Após o sacrifício dos animais, as línguas foram submetidas a análise histológica para classificação da presença de angiogeneses, proliferação fibroblástica e epitelial e células inflamatórias em boa, moderada e fraca. RESULTADOS: Os resultados indicaram que as feridas realizadas com bisturi elétricos apresentaram um retardo no processo cicatricial e uma maior resposta inflamatória quando comparadas com as feridas do bisturi frio, apesar de não ter havido diferença estatisticamente significante (p<0.05). CONCLUSÃO: Não houve diferença significante entre o bisturi elétrico e frio em relação a presença de angiogeneses, proliferação fibroblástica e epitelial e células inflamatórias para nenhum dos dois tempos de avaliação.

Suitability of electrosurgical analysers for routine maintenance testing of electrosurgery units - a technical note.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of electrosurgical analysers in testing power output and leakage current from an electrosurgery unit and compare this to the manufacturer recommendations for routine testing. METHOD: Two electrosurgical analysers were compared to reference measurements (carried out using non-inductive resistors, a current transformer and oscilloscope) over a range of tests described in IEC 60601-2-2: 1998 measuring power output and leakage currents in different conditions. The analysers used were Metron QA-ES and Fluke 454A. OUTCOMES: Both analysers gave similar results to the reference measurements for power output. The Metron QA-ES gave similar results to the reference measurements for leakage current testing; however the Fluke 454A gave substantially different results when used as described in the manual. CONCLUSIONS: Electrosurgical analysers can be a valuable tool in the workshop, enabling rapid, accurate testing of electrosurgery equipment without needing additional equipment and setting up times. Not all analysers can perform all the tests that may be needed and in some cases the accuracy of the results is questionable. Users must be certain of the capabilities and limitations of the analyser before making decisions based on the results.

Padronização na descrição de parâmetros da radioeletroncirurgia / No disponible

No disponible

Electrosurgery in patients with pacemakers/implanted cardioverter defibrillators.

Despite improved protective mechanisms, pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators are subject to interference from various sources. An effective means of hemostasis, electrocautery generates electromagnetic interference and may be problematic in this patient population. Reported complication rates are low, but the consequences can be serious. Recommendations regarding the management of patients with implanted cardiac devices become increasingly significant both as the number of patients with devices increases and the number of out-of-hospital/minor surgery procedures performed increases. This article provides surgeons and anesthetists with practical recommendations for use of electrocautery in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardiac defibrillators.